|
The management of the
mobility in a wide urban area is a challenge which requires a comprehensive
vision, an integrated management of both private and public transport, the use of advanced technologies and
events forecast, a multimedia information system co-ordinated for all the
transport modalities.
The
environment issue is strictly related to the above illustrated themes,
either for the pollution emissions reduction and for the use of resources
obtained from non-renewable energy sources. Basing on these considerations,
the Municipality of Milan established an Agency able to give an
indispensable support for the tasks of planning and programming.
The local transport reform, started with the Legislative Decrees 422/97 and
112/98, and with the Regional Law 22/98, opened to the market the former
concession of the transport contract, provided also by European Directives
and rules, can be reasons enough to start the Agency activities.
|
 |
 |
|
Milan,
which is geographically situated on the northern side of the country, is
the economical and financial centre; it is, in fact, an industry, finance,
tertiary industry capital and main site of prestigious universities.
Heart of the information and the communication, Milan is one of the best
articulated and integrated productive basins in Europe.
For these reasons it is very difficult to face the mobility problems of
Milan limiting the extension to the administrative boudaries.
The Milan and Lombardy area has a wide and flexible basin, populated by
over 7.5 million inhabitants.
The airports of Malpensa and Linate, together with Orio al Serio, represent
the entrance door in Italy from Europe and the world. Milan
is situated in the midpoint of a wide urban system, formed not only by the
city and the neighbouring towns, but also by other crown cities situated in
Lombardy and other Regions, such as Novara and Piacenza, which have
historically built up a strong relationship network with Milan.
|
|
 |
|
A
real demarcation line between mobility and environment cannot be traced in
planning.
The rationalisation of the urban traffic raises the efficiency of the
metropolitan network relationships an increases the urban quality of life.
An example above all illustrate what affirmed: the limitation to the
circulation of private cars within the cities. If,
from one side this measure is imposed by the necessity of maintaining the
accessibility levels precluded by high congestion levels, which decrease
efficiency and functionality of the urban system, from other side it
consents to face the growing demand of a higher environmental quality and
better quality of life.
|
|
 |